Top 5 UserVoice Alternatives in 2025

UserVoice was great. In 2008. Back when the iPhone was new and we thought flip phones were pretty cool. But somewhere along the way, they decided to focus exclusively on Fortune 500 companies with Fortune 500 budgets.

Starting at $699/month minimum (and that’s if you pay annually), UserVoice has priced out 99% of the market. The interface still looks like 2008, the setup process is complex enough to require consultants, and you need quarterly billing commitments. The average UserVoice customer pays $21,000 per year.

If you’re looking for modern feedback management without the enterprise price tag, here are 5 alternatives that actually make sense for growing teams.

For a detailed analysis of UserVoice’s pricing structure and hidden costs, see our UserVoice pricing breakdown.

---

1. UserJot: Built for Modern SaaS Teams

UserJot takes everything UserVoice does and delivers it at 5% of the cost. We built it specifically for teams who need professional feedback management without enterprise complexity.

What Makes It Different:

• $29/month vs $699/month - Save $8,040/year minimum
• Unlimited users - UserVoice limits you to 200 users on their starter plan
• Public roadmaps - UserVoice only offers internal roadmaps
• Modern interface - Clean design that users actually enjoy using
• 5-minute setup - No consultants or complex onboarding needed
• JWT-based SSO included - Enterprise auth without enterprise pricing
• AI-powered features - Smart categorization and duplicate detection

The Complete Package:

Unlike UserVoice’s limited feature set, UserJot includes feedback boards, public roadmaps, and changelogs in one tool. No need to buy multiple products or deal with complex integrations.

Pricing: Free forever plan available, $29/month Starter (custom domain, branding), $59/month Professional (SSO, unlimited boards).

Best for: SaaS companies that want UserVoice-level features without UserVoice-level pricing or complexity.

---

2. Canny

Canny emerged as the go-to UserVoice alternative for modern teams. They’ve built a solid product with a clean interface and good feature set.

What Makes It Different:

• Modern design - Actually looks like it was built this decade
• Better voting system - More engaging than UserVoice’s basic votes
• Public boards by default - Built for transparency
• Changelog included - UserVoice’s changelog features are limited
• Good integrations - Jira, Slack, Intercom, and more
• Responsive team - Unlike UserVoice’s phone-only support

Watch the Pricing:

Canny’s “tracked user” model counts anyone who gives feedback. Vote once? You’re tracked. Comment? Tracked. Their AI Autopilot adds users automatically. Teams often hit limits fast and face surprise bills. Still cheaper than UserVoice, but costs add up.

Pricing: Free up to 25 tracked users, then $99-$399/month based on user count.

Best for: Teams who want a proven UserVoice alternative and don’t mind user-based pricing that can scale unexpectedly.

---

3. Nolt

Nolt strips feedback management down to essentials. No bloat, no complex features, just clean and simple feedback boards.

What Makes It Different:

• Dead simple - UserVoice requires training; Nolt takes 2 minutes to understand
• Minimal design - Focus stays on feedback, not features
• Fair pricing - Flat monthly rate, no user counting
• Guest voting - Users can vote without accounts
• Fast performance - Lightweight and responsive
• No feature creep - Does one thing really well

The Trade-offs:

Nolt keeps things simple, which means fewer features than UserVoice. No roadmap tools, limited integrations, basic customization. But for many teams, that’s exactly what they want.

Pricing: No free plan. $29/month Essential, $69/month Pro with more boards and features.

Best for: Teams who found UserVoice overwhelming and just want simple feedback collection that works.

---

4. Fider

Fider brings transparency to a whole new level - the code itself is open source. Perfect for developer-focused products or teams with specific requirements.

What Makes It Different:

• Open source - Modify anything, own your data completely
• Self-hosted option - Keep feedback on your servers
• Developer-friendly - Built by developers, for developers
• Reddit-style voting - Familiar upvote/downvote system
• No vendor lock-in - Export and move anytime
• Community-driven - Features added based on user needs

Consider the Costs:

While Fider is free to self-host, you’ll need technical expertise, server costs, maintenance time, and someone to handle updates. The managed version at $49/month saves these headaches.

Pricing: Free if self-hosted, $49/month for managed hosting with support.

Best for: Developer tools, open source projects, or teams with strong technical capabilities who want full control.

---

5. ProductBoard

If UserVoice isn’t enterprise enough for you (yes, that’s possible), ProductBoard goes even further with advanced prioritization and strategic planning tools.

What Makes It Different:

• Advanced prioritization - Scoring formulas, impact mapping, custom fields
• Strategic alignment - Connect feedback to company objectives
• Multiple frameworks - RICE, Value vs Effort, custom scoring
• Rich insights - AI-powered analysis and trends
• Enterprise integrations - Salesforce, SAP, Microsoft ecosystem
• Extensive customization - Workflows, fields, permissions

The Price Reality:

ProductBoard makes UserVoice look affordable. Expect $70,000-$100,000/year for a 20-person team. It’s powerful but requires significant investment in both money and time.

Pricing: Contact sales only. Minimum ~$30,000/year, typically $70,000+.

Best for: Large enterprises with complex product portfolios who find UserVoice too basic and have substantial budgets.

---

Making the Right Choice

If UserVoice is too expensive: UserJot gives you everything at 5% of the cost. Canny and Nolt are also solid options under $100/month.

If UserVoice is too complex: Nolt strips away complexity. UserJot balances features with simplicity.

If UserVoice is too limited: ProductBoard adds enterprise features (at enterprise prices). UserJot includes public roadmaps and better changelogs UserVoice lacks.

If you want open source: Fider lets you own everything, though you’ll need technical skills.

For most teams: UserJot hits the sweet spot - professional features, modern design, fair pricing, and no user limits. It’s what UserVoice could have been if they hadn’t abandoned everyone except Fortune 500 companies.

The feedback tool market has evolved significantly since 2008. You don’t need to pay $21,000/year for outdated software anymore. Pick a tool that fits your budget and workflow, not one that requires a procurement department.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is UserVoice so expensive compared to alternatives?

UserVoice focuses exclusively on large enterprise customers now. Starting at $699/month with quarterly minimums, they’ve priced out smaller teams. Modern alternatives like UserJot offer similar features starting at $29/month.

Can I migrate my data from UserVoice?

Yes. UserJot offers one-click migration from UserVoice. Canny provides import tools. Nolt and Fider support CSV imports. Most alternatives make switching straightforward to win your business.

Do these alternatives offer the same security as UserVoice?

UserJot and Canny offer SOC 2 compliance and enterprise security features. ProductBoard exceeds UserVoice’s security standards. Fider (self-hosted) gives you complete control. Check specific certifications based on your needs.

Which alternative has the best pricing for small teams?

UserJot’s free plan is unlimited, and paid plans start at $29/month with no user limits. Nolt is $29/month flat rate. Canny’s free plan works for very small teams but hits limits quickly. All are 95%+ cheaper than UserVoice.

Can users vote without creating accounts?

UserJot, Nolt, and Fider support guest voting. Canny requires email verification. UserVoice requires full account creation. Guest voting typically doubles participation rates.

Which tools include public roadmaps?

UserJot, Canny, Nolt, and Fider all support public roadmaps. UserVoice surprisingly only offers internal roadmaps, even on expensive plans. If transparency matters, avoid UserVoice.

What’s the main difference between these tools?

UserJot focuses on being complete and affordable. Canny is feature-rich but watch the pricing. Nolt keeps things minimal. Fider is open source. ProductBoard is for complex enterprises. All are more modern than UserVoice.

Is UserVoice still worth considering?

Only if you’re a large enterprise with specific compliance needs and a $20,000+ annual budget. For everyone else, modern alternatives offer better value, design, and features at a fraction of the cost.